EMR Fails: Why It Happens & How to Save Your Clinic

Neha Srivastava
on
September 17, 2024

Featured

Prescription Pad
Clinic Management Dashboard
Health Insights and Analytics
OCR (Optical Character Recognition) Capabilities
Patient Follow-up and Communication Tools

95%

Patient Satisfaction

30%

Reduction in Wait Times

2x

Appointment Efficiency

Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) are widely acknowledged to have a positive impact on healthcare. Even though a large number of the healthcare organizations have started using EMR systems in India to manage data efficiently, there have been many failures, either failing entirely or not being effectively utilized. As a result, doctors have become deeply disillusioned with their implementation process and results.

1. Technical Issues

  • Complexity: EMR systems can offer a plethora of features, but if they are too complex (especially for end users), they can be confusing. This complexity may result in incorrect data entry, the software's full functionality not being utilized and reduced user satisfaction.
  • Hardware and Software Compatibility: Incompatibility between the EMR software and existing hardware (computers, servers or other related devices) can be a significant issue. Workflow interruption by system crashes or sluggish performance can lead to serious errors in patient data management.
  • Internet Issues: Stable internet access is important to keep the EMR working on cloud mode. When clinics have slow or unreliable internet, it hinders their ability to access patient data.
  • Data Security Breaches: Protection of patient records must comply with privacy regulations. Subpar cybersecurity measures can lead to hacked data and royalties can face substantial fines as well as losing trust from patients.

2. User Adoption and Training

  • Lack of Training: All users need a comprehensive training program. If employees haven't been properly trained, they may not know about crucial features or may be working in ways that are less than ideal which can lead to mistakes and less efficiency.
  • Resistance to Change: Healthcare providers have been following conventional systems and find it hard to switch to the new ways. This resistance can lead to suboptimal use of the EMR, if not outright rejection.
  • EMR-Workflow Disruption: EMRs that do not align with the existing workflow may disrupt or complicate the process. Once deployed, staff would likely work around the software than with it, leading to inefficiency.

3. Implementation and Support

  • Lack of Planning: A successful EMR implementation needs thorough planning like to know what the clinic needs, how scheduling will work and who will need access to resources. If there is lack of vision, implementation delays and operational hindrances ensue.
  • Vendor Support: A strong vendor support is essential to troubleshoot any issues that may occur. In case of an unresponsive or ignorant vendor, finding out the bug would be difficult and the system may not work perfectly.
  • Cost Overruns: Getting started with an EMR can come with a significant upfront cost. Hidden expenses like cost of hardware upgrades, licensing fees and long-term maintenance - straining a clinic's budget and resources.

4. Integration Issues

  • Interoperability: Effective patient care often requires integrating the EMR with other healthcare systems, like lab systems and pharmacies. Ineffective communication can lead to fragmented patient records and hinder coordinated care.
  • Data Migration: Transferring data from older systems to a new EMR can be challenging, including potential data loss, inaccuracies or corruption during the transition. Proper data cleansing and migration strategies are essential to mitigate these risks.

5. Clinical Workflow Challenges

  • Time Consuming Data Entry: If the EMR necessitates excessive data entry, it can limit time spent with patients, leading to burnout and a decline in job satisfaction.
  • Lack of Customization: A one-size-fits-all EMR may not account for the specific needs of the clinic. Customization options are vital in ensuring that the software meets the unique demands and workflows of the clinic.

HOW CAN YOU AVOID IT

The following are some strategies clinics should use to overcome these difficulties:

Opt for a User-Friendly System: If your EMR is user-friendly, it will help save time in getting through the training and leave everybody happy.

Adequate Staff Training: Conduct regular training sessions to get staff up-to-speed with the system. Training programs can be customized to function-specific roles (e.g: physicians vs admin)

Technical support: Access to prompt technical support can assist users in troubleshooting any problems quickly and thus can encourage the appropriate use of the system.

Implementation Planning: A thorough implementation plan should specify detail about schedule, who is responsible for which actions and input of resources. Involving all the stakeholders in this planning process is important.

Security compliance: Investing in robust cybersecurity measures and periodic audits can help protect patient data  and fulfil compliance.

Impact on clinical workflow: Have discussions with staff about daily workflow and how the EMR can fit. Identifying potential disruptions and involving users in the selection and customization process can foster acceptance and innovation.

Conclusion

While EMR systems offer numerous benefits, clinics and clinical support staff are often reluctant to make changes because these systems are not uniformly welcomed. Healthcare providers often experience issues while deploying EMR solutions because of no clear leadership and not involving all stakeholders in achieving common goals. However, failure of these systems is common due to problems in project management, lack of human talent for monitoring the system and other technical, organizational or regulatory impediments. Once an EMR is implemented, it should benefit the practice—but only if everyone knows how to use these systems properly. This is the way to achieve higher quality patient care, safety and profitability of the organization.